Commentary on Jane Austen's Works
In
my Oxford University Press edition (1983) of Jane Austen's works,
edited by R. W. Chapman, there is a collection of comments from
friends, relations, and others that Jane Austen had gathered and
transcribed.
Here
are a few:
"We
certainly do not think it as a whole equal to P&P--but
it has many and great beauties. Fanny is a delightful Character!
and Aunt Norris is a great favourite of mine. The Characters are
natural and well supported, and many of the dialogues excellent.
You need not fear the publication being considered as discreditable
to the talents of its author." That from Francis William
Austen.
From
the brother who was adopted out: "Not so clever as P&P--but
pleased with it altogether. Liked the character of Fanny. Admired
the Portsmouth scene."
Here
are more family opinions: "Edward and George [Knight]--Not
liked it near so well as P&P; Edward admired Fanny, George
disliked her. George interested by nobody but Mary Crawford. Edward
pleased with Henry C; Edmund objected to, as cold and formal.
Henry C.'s going off with Mrs. Rushworth at such a time, when
so much in love with Fanny, thought unnatural by Edward."
Fanny
Knight, one of Jane Austen's favorite young relatives, thought:
"Liked it, in many parts, very much indeed, delighted with
Fanny; but not satisfied with the end--wanting more Love between
her and Edmund--and could not think it natural that Edmund should
be so much attached to a woman without Principle like Mary C.--or
promote Fanny's marrying Henry."
Here
are some opinions that one would expect to hear:
"Mr.
Edgerton the publisher praised it for its Morality, and for being
so equal a composition--No weak parts."
Mrs.
Carrick: "All who think deeply and feel much will give the
Preference to Mansfield Park."
Lady
Rob: Kerr: "You may be assured I read every line with the
greatest interest and am more delighted with it than my humble
pen can express. The excellent delineation of Character, sound
sense, Elegant Language and the pure morality with which it abounds,
makes it a most desirable as well as useful work, and reflects
the highest honour, etc, etc--Universally admired in Edinburgh,
by all the wise ones--Indeed, I have not heard a single
fault given to it."
Then
there's Mrs. Pole: "There is a particular satisfaction in
reading all Miss A--s works--they are so evidently written by
a Gentlewoman--most Novelists fail and betray themselves in attempting
to describe familiar scenes in high Life, some little vulgarism
escapes and shews that they are experimentally acquainted with
what they describe, but here it is quite different. Everything
is natural, and the situations and incidents are told in a manner
which clearly evinces the Writer to belong to the Society
whose Manners she so ably delineates."
Of
the 39 opinions recorded, 12 of them preferred Pride and Prejudice;
I think 3 preferred Mansfield Park to P&P or S&S.
Many thought it as good, or were ambivalent.
Most
liked Fanny, not many liked Edmund. One thought Henry's eloping
good, more thought it unnatural. Several liked the Portsmouth
scenes. At least half loved Aunt Norris; "Mrs. Anna Harwood
delighted with Mrs. Norris and the Green Curtain," and Mrs.
Cook "wished for a good Matronly Character."
Miss
Sharpe: "I think it excellent--and of its good sense and
moral Tendency there can be no doubt. Your Characters are drawn
to the Life, so very, very natural and just--but as you
beg me to be perfectly honest, I must confess I prefer P&P."
Plenty
of others show an interest in the comedy, and responded to the
artistry of the characters, but no one seemed to feel that Fanny
and Edmund were a great match. Those who liked MP all talk of
its morality and good sense.
Then,
of course, there is an opinion of the sort that never lets a writer
get above herself: "Mrs. Augusta Bramstone owned that she
thought S&S and P&P downright nonsense, but expected to
like MP better, and having finished the first volume, flattered
herself she had got through the worst."